100 Examples of sentences containing the adverb "inadequately"

Definition

The adverb inadequately means in a manner that is insufficient or not enough to meet the requirements or expectations. It describes actions or conditions that fail to fulfill a necessary standard or level of quality.

Synonyms

• Insufficiently
• Poorly
• Deficiently
• Incompletely
• Unacceptably
• Suboptimally
• Unsatisfactorily
• Weakly

Antonyms

• Adequately
• Sufficiently
• Satisfactorily
• Competently
• Sufficiently
• Effectively
• Appropriately
• Satisfyingly

Examples

1. The project was inadequately funded, leading to delays.
2. She expressed her thoughts inadequately, causing misunderstandings.
3. The system was inadequately tested before the launch.
4. His explanation was inadequately clear for the audience.
5. The report was inadequately detailed to support the conclusion.
6. They inadequately addressed the concerns raised during the meeting.
7. The resources were inadequately allocated for the task.
8. The training was inadequately conducted, leaving employees confused.
9. The safety measures were inadequately implemented, posing risks.
10. The organization inadequately prepared for the emergency situation.
11. Her performance was inadequately recognized by the management.
12. The software was inadequately designed to handle user demands.
13. The marketing strategy was inadequately executed, resulting in low sales.
14. The instructions were inadequately written, causing many errors.
15. His argument was inadequately supported by evidence.
16. The infrastructure was inadequately maintained over the years.
17. The communication was inadequately managed, leading to confusion.
18. The budget was inadequately planned, resulting in overspending.
19. The guidelines were inadequately communicated to the staff.
20. The team inadequately assessed the risks involved in the project.
21. Her feedback was inadequately taken into consideration during the review.
22. The facilities were inadequately equipped for the event.
23. The follow-up was inadequately conducted, leaving many questions unanswered.
24. The data was inadequately analyzed, yielding misleading results.
25. The time allotted for the presentation was inadequately short.
26. The support provided was inadequately responsive to customer needs.
27. The evaluation was inadequately thorough, missing critical details.
28. The training materials were inadequately prepared for the participants.
29. The product was inadequately marketed, failing to reach its target audience.
30. The service was inadequately delivered, frustrating many clients.
31. The legal advice was inadequately researched, leading to complications.
32. The analysis was inadequately supported by credible sources.
33. The curriculum was inadequately updated, lacking current information.
34. The event was inadequately planned, resulting in numerous logistical issues.
35. The staffing levels were inadequately managed to meet demands.
36. The presentation was inadequately rehearsed, leading to mistakes.
37. The approach was inadequately innovative, lacking creativity.
38. The feedback loop was inadequately established, hindering improvement.
39. The security measures were inadequately enforced, risking breaches.
40. The resources were inadequately utilized, leading to waste.
41. The analysis was inadequately detailed, leaving gaps in understanding.
42. The team's efforts were inadequately recognized by peers.
43. The safety protocols were inadequately followed during the operation.
44. The outreach was inadequately executed, missing potential users.
45. The assessment criteria were inadequately defined, causing confusion.
46. The investigation was inadequately conducted, leaving many unanswered questions.
47. The documentation was inadequately maintained, complicating retrieval.
48. The software updates were inadequately implemented, causing bugs.
49. The project timeline was inadequately estimated, leading to rushed work.
50. The client expectations were inadequately managed throughout the process.
51. The equipment was inadequately maintained, leading to frequent breakdowns.
52. The findings were inadequately presented, lacking clarity.
53. The team's collaboration was inadequately coordinated, causing delays.
54. The user experience was inadequately considered during development.
55. The funding was inadequately secured, jeopardizing the initiative.
56. The risk assessment was inadequately performed, missing critical factors.
57. The onboarding process was inadequately structured for new hires.
58. The customer service was inadequately trained to handle complaints.
59. The feedback was inadequately addressed in the final report.
60. The project goals were inadequately articulated at the outset.
61. The workshop was inadequately attended, limiting discussions.
62. The budget report was inadequately justified, raising concerns.
63. The collaboration was inadequately facilitated, leading to misunderstandings.
64. The health measures were inadequately enforced during the pandemic.
65. The final product was inadequately tested for usability.
66. The cultural differences were inadequately acknowledged in the discussions.
67. The event's marketing was inadequately targeted, missing key demographics.
68. The conclusions were inadequately supported by the data presented.
69. The level of engagement was inadequately sustained throughout the meeting.
70. The software was inadequately optimized for performance.
71. The quality control measures were inadequately applied in production.
72. The safety guidelines were inadequately communicated to the workforce.
73. The team was inadequately prepared for the unexpected challenges.
74. The resources were inadequately distributed among departments.
75. The initiative was inadequately funded, hindering its success.
76. The research was inadequately conducted, failing to meet academic standards.
77. The service level was inadequately monitored, leading to issues.
78. The presentation was inadequately tailored to the audience's needs.
79. The follow-up actions were inadequately executed after the event.
80. The customer feedback was inadequately incorporated into future plans.
81. The performance metrics were inadequately defined for assessment.
82. The team dynamics were inadequately managed, causing friction.
83. The legal framework was inadequately applied in the case.
84. The repair process was inadequately documented, complicating future work.
85. The conflict resolution strategies were inadequately employed.
86. The communication strategy was inadequately developed for outreach.
87. The project scope was inadequately defined, leading to scope creep.
88. The supply chain was inadequately managed, causing delays.
89. The analysis was inadequately performed, affecting the outcome.
90. The objectives were inadequately aligned with the overall mission.
91. The fundraising efforts were inadequately promoted, affecting results.
92. The technical support was inadequately provided to users.
93. The documentation was inadequately organized for easy access.
94. The training sessions were inadequately scheduled, limiting attendance.
95. The implementation plan was inadequately communicated to stakeholders.
96. The software features were inadequately integrated, causing confusion.
97. The research grant was inadequately applied for, reducing chances of success.
98. The quality assurance processes were inadequately followed during production.
99. The team was inadequately briefed on the project's requirements.
100. The marketing materials were inadequately designed, failing to attract attention.