100 Examples of sentences containing the adjective "quasi judicial"
Definition
The term quasi-judicial refers to actions, processes, or entities that have some characteristics of a judicial proceeding or function, but are not fully judicial in nature. It typically involves decision-making that is binding, involves the evaluation of evidence, and may include the resolution of disputes, but it does not take place in a court of law. Quasi-judicial processes are often seen in administrative agencies or boards that have the authority to make decisions on regulatory matters.
Synonyms
- Semi-judicial
 - Administrative
 - Regulatory
 - Arbitrative
 - Adjudicative
 
Antonyms
- Non-judicial
 - Legislative
 - Executive
 - Informal
 - Advisory
 
Examples
- The quasi-judicial hearing allowed the agency to determine the outcome of the dispute.
 - Many regulatory bodies operate under quasi-judicial rules.
 - The quasi-judicial process was established to ensure fairness in administrative decisions.
 - A quasi-judicial tribunal made the final determination on the environmental impact.
 - The school board's decision-making process is often considered quasi-judicial.
 - The quasi-judicial nature of the arbitration proceedings was evident in the detailed findings.
 - She was appointed to a quasi-judicial role in the housing authority.
 - Many states have quasi-judicial committees to handle disputes concerning public utilities.
 - The quasi-judicial review was criticized for lacking transparency.
 - In a quasi-judicial hearing, both parties are allowed to present evidence.
 - The quasi-judicial panel reached a decision after reviewing the case thoroughly.
 - His role is quasi-judicial, as he acts as both a mediator and a decision-maker.
 - The quasi-judicial functions of the commission include issuing permits and licenses.
 - An appeal from a quasi-judicial decision usually goes to a higher administrative body.
 - The quasi-judicial review process provides a mechanism for oversight.
 - Quasi-judicial decisions can sometimes be contested in court.
 - The agency's quasi-judicial powers allow it to enforce regulations.
 - They held a quasi-judicial hearing to address community concerns.
 - The quasi-judicial nature of the process was designed to improve accountability.
 - In a quasi-judicial setting, procedural fairness is paramount.
 - The quasi-judicial review board will evaluate the new policy proposals.
 - During the quasi-judicial proceedings, expert witnesses were called to testify.
 - The quasi-judicial nature of the decision made it difficult to appeal.
 - A quasi-judicial agency has the authority to impose penalties.
 - The findings of the quasi-judicial panel were binding and enforceable.
 - The quasi-judicial hearing was open to the public for transparency.
 - Many professional licensing boards operate in a quasi-judicial capacity.
 - The quasi-judicial nature of the review process ensures fairness and impartiality.
 - The quasi-judicial decision sparked a debate among stakeholders.
 - He was involved in a quasi-judicial role during the investigation.
 - The quasi-judicial aspects of the process require strict adherence to the rules.
 - The quasi-judicial authority to enforce regulations lies with the commission.
 - The quasi-judicial system aims to resolve disputes without full court proceedings.
 - The quasi-judicial process often includes public hearings.
 - The quasi-judicial nature of the board's decisions adds to their legitimacy.
 - The report was produced following a quasi-judicial inquiry.
 - The quasi-judicial nature of the proceedings allows for a thorough examination of facts.
 - Her role in the quasi-judicial committee was crucial to the outcome.
 - The quasi-judicial decision-making process involves rigorous standards.
 - The quasi-judicial review concluded that the allegations were unfounded.
 - Quasi-judicial hearings often resemble court trials but lack full judicial authority.
 - The quasi-judicial investigation revealed significant procedural flaws.
 - They are tasked with making quasi-judicial determinations regarding claims.
 - The quasi-judicial nature of the review enhances public trust in the agency.
 - The quasi-judicial framework allows for flexibility in decision-making.
 - The quasi-judicial adjudication process is a critical part of regulatory enforcement.
 - An important aspect of quasi-judicial processes is the right to appeal.
 - The quasi-judicial nature of the hearing ensured that all sides were heard.
 - The quasi-judicial authority allows agencies to make binding decisions.
 - The members of the quasi-judicial panel were carefully selected for their expertise.
 - The quasi-judicial nature of the arbitration process is often beneficial for both parties.
 - The quasi-judicial decision was met with mixed reactions from the public.
 - They established a quasi-judicial framework to address the environmental concerns.
 - The quasi-judicial proceedings were designed to expedite the resolution process.
 - The quasi-judicial authority of the board is derived from state law.
 - The quasi-judicial process allows for an impartial review of the evidence.
 - A quasi-judicial inquiry may lead to formal recommendations.
 - The quasi-judicial nature of the proceedings was essential for fairness.
 - They are often seen as quasi-judicial entities with specific regulatory powers.
 - The quasi-judicial nature of the hearings ensures that justice is served.
 - The quasi-judicial review process requires adherence to established legal standards.
 - The quasi-judicial decision was upheld on appeal.
 - A quasi-judicial body can impose sanctions for non-compliance.
 - The quasi-judicial nature of the tribunal allows for a more efficient resolution of disputes.
 - The quasi-judicial framework is intended to protect public interests.
 - The quasi-judicial inquiry revealed systemic issues within the organization.
 - Many organizations rely on quasi-judicial processes to resolve conflicts.
 - The quasi-judicial forum provided a platform for both sides to present their cases.
 - The quasi-judicial nature of regulatory hearings is meant to ensure accountability.
 - In many cases, quasi-judicial decisions can have far-reaching implications.
 - The quasi-judicial nature of the arbitration process is often preferred by businesses.
 - The quasi-judicial committee was formed to enhance oversight of the process.
 - The quasi-judicial nature of the proceedings was questioned by critics.
 - The quasi-judicial authority granted to the agency allows it to function effectively.
 - The quasi-judicial process is designed to resolve disputes efficiently.
 - The quasi-judicial findings were made public to ensure transparency.
 - The quasi-judicial nature of the hearing provided an opportunity for public comment.
 - The quasi-judicial panel's decision was seen as a precedent for future cases.
 - The quasi-judicial process can sometimes lead to unintended consequences.
 - The quasi-judicial review found no evidence of wrongdoing.
 - The quasi-judicial framework is essential for maintaining regulatory integrity.
 - The quasi-judicial nature of the tribunal allowed for a thorough examination of the facts.
 - The quasi-judicial authority enables agencies to enforce compliance with regulations.
 - The quasi-judicial process is often more accessible than traditional court systems.
 - The quasi-judicial hearings can be a crucial part of the regulatory process.
 - The quasi-judicial nature of the inquiry ensures that all stakeholders are considered.
 - The quasi-judicial functions of the commission are vital for public safety.
 - The quasi-judicial review process is critical in maintaining fairness and equity.
 - The quasi-judicial committee reached a unanimous decision regarding the policy changes.
 - The quasi-judicial authority is designed to protect the rights of individuals.
 - The quasi-judicial nature of the hearing helps to clarify misunderstandings.
 - The quasi-judicial proceedings are governed by specific rules and regulations.
 - The quasi-judicial decision prompted a review of existing policies.
 - The quasi-judicial nature of the process is meant to enhance credibility.
 - The quasi-judicial framework is essential for resolving regulatory disputes.
 - The quasi-judicial authority allows for a balanced approach to enforcement.
 - The quasi-judicial process ensures that all evidence is considered.
 - The quasi-judicial committee is responsible for overseeing compliance issues.
 - The quasi-judicial nature of the proceedings allows for expert testimony.
 - The quasi-judicial findings will play a significant role in future regulations.
 
